Jaldia Abubakra, a member of the Executive Committee of the Masar Badil, the Palestinian Alternative Revolutionary Path Movement, stated that the formation of the so-called “Board of Peace,” along with what is being promoted under the title of a “National Committee for the Administration of Gaza,” constitutes nothing but lethal political landmines aimed at circumventing the sacrifices of the Palestinian people and their resistance. These initiatives seek to overtake and prevent the outcomes of the legendary steadfastness of the Gaza Strip by re-imposing U.S.–Zionist domination through both soft and hard power instruments and deceptive labels.
Abubakra emphasized that the Palestinian people “will not be deceived by such schemes or these newly manufactured frameworks,” fully aware that they represent a direct continuation of U.S.–Zionist colonial project, which has failed militarily and in security terms to break the Palestinian national will. This failure has pushed Washington to shift toward the political track as an alternative means of dismantling the gains of steadfastness, stripping the Palestinian people of their national decision-making power, and transforming Gaza into a territory placed under colonial tutelage through local and international intermediaries.
She stressed that any American, European, or Zionist moves in the Gaza Strip cannot be treated as “humanitarian” or “politically neutral initiatives,” underscoring that Washington provides political cover to entrench facts that the occupation failed to impose by force. These efforts aim to impose so-called “transitional arrangements” that empty the Palestinian cause of its content and reorganize the political landscape in a manner that serves the security of the Zionist entity and the interests of its imperialist allies and sponsors.
Abubakra noted that the enemy’s rejection of certain individuals within these councils and committees is merely a repeated Zionist tactic, through which the entity seeks to extract further gains at the expense of the Palestinian people, while simultaneously marketing Netanyahu’s positions internally and preserving the cohesion of his ruling coalition in the face of Israeli electoral pressures.
She warned of the grave danger of placing any bet on these political tracks, describing them as a direct threat to the unity of the resistance and the unity of the people, and as an attempt to engineer internal Palestinian fractures by importing local and international actors tied to the enemy and the U.S. administration, under the banners of “stability” and “reconstruction.”
Abubakra called on the Palestinian resistance forces to uphold the highest levels of field unity and political vigilance, to firmly reject all externally imposed frameworks and councils, and to refuse to be drawn in by glittering titles designed to gradually domesticate the resistance and convert the sacrifices of the Palestinian people into bargaining chips in American decision-making rooms.
She concluded by stressing the urgent necessity for the vanguards of the Palestinian people in the homeland and the diaspora to take the initiative in “forming popular oversight bodies rooted in free national will, to defend the achievements of the Al-Aqsa Flood, confront the role of institutions linked to the United States and its projects in the Gaza Strip, ensure popular protection for the gains of the resistance, safeguard the immense sacrifices made by the Palestinian people, and prevent the transformation of legendary popular steadfastness into a political defeat.”